Interview

Sri Lanka apparel sector risks losing $494m  

In an exclusive interview, Joint Apparel Association Forum Sri Lanka secretary general, Yohan Lawrence, shares his perspective on Sri Lanka's critical need to retain the EU's Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+) post-December 2023 and the potential consequences if it is revoked. 

Joint Apparel Association Forum Sri Lanka secretary general, Yohan Lawrence says if Sri Lanka is to lose GSP+, the combined loss for the apparel sector is estimated at $494m, which is 79% of the estimated trade loss. Credit JAAF.

Lawrence explains that with the current GSP+ regulation set to expire by the end 2023, it is imperative that Sri Lanka takes measures to secure concessionary access to the European market. Securing GSP+ depends on Sri Lanka upholding the already ratified conventions spanning human rights, labour, environment and governance. 

In fact, he says that if Sri Lanka is to lose GSP+, the combined loss for the apparel sector is estimated at $494m, which is 79% of the estimated trade loss.  

Laura Husband: What is the current state of Sri Lanka’s economy, and how does it impact the apparel sector?

Yohan Lawrence: Sri Lanka’s overall economic outlook shows slow but steady signs of recovery, especially after the Sri Lankan Government reached a staff-level agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a four-year Extended-Fund Facility programme (EFF) earlier this year. This is critical to inspire investor confidence and attract much-needed foreign direct investment (FDI) to the country. 

With that being said, the country was able to achieve over $1bn in March in exports for the first time in 2023; however, in apparel exports specifically, there has been a 15-25% drop in orders as a result of the global economic slowdown caused by the increase in interest rates to combat high inflation in the West specifically in major exporting countries including the US, UK and Europe. 

Recent data shows apparel exports declining by 14.95% year-on-year (YoY) to $1.18bn in the first quarter of this year compared to the same period last year, which is the lowest since the first quarter of 2013. The industry projects it could be five to six more months before it sees a recovery in global demand.  

Laura Husband: Can you explain the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP+) and why securing it is essential for Sri Lanka’s apparel sector?

Yohan Lawrence: GSP+ is a trade incentive granted by the European Union (EU) to developing countries, eligible to import items to the EU market, guaranteeing increased trade with the EU. It has also been observed that the EU’s GSP+ helps developing countries alleviate poverty by generating employment across vulnerable communities specifically, adding skill, knowledge and technological know-how to a pool of resources and creating jobs based on international values and principles. 

Latest data shows that EU imports from Sri Lanka amounted to about EUR2.55bn in 2021, of which approximately 54% benefitted from reduced tariffs under the GSP+ arrangement. Moreover, 85% of Sri Lanka’s current exports are eligible for tariff reductions under the GSP+ scheme. Such preferential access granted through GSP+ provides Sri Lankan apparel exporters with an advantage of diversification and exploring new export opportunities. 

It is important to note that the apparel industry has experienced a rapid decline in demand (15%-25%) amid an ongoing dip in apparel exports in the first quarter of this year. Securing GSP+ within the two-year period post-December 2023 becomes critical in this context, as the apparel industry cannot absorb a further reduction in orders with the loss of the concessionary scheme nor the Sri Lankan economy bear the loss of essential foreign exchange inflows and investment incentives the GSP+ scheme underwrites. 

Gold exploration in Scotland. Credit: Peter Summers via Getty Images

What differentiates us to many global gold producers is the high-grade nature of our mine. We run an average grade of around 11 grams per tonne of gold, which is exceptionally high and as such we generate more revenues per ounce produced than a lower grade mine would. Roughly, we are producing around 1,000 ounces of gold per month and our objective, in line with our mining plan, is to reach phase two level of around 2,000 ounces per month.

The strategy of the company has been to achieve phase one and then to self-fund phase two. We aim to achieve phase two in the first half 2023 with around 23,500 ounces plus run rate of gold a year.

The financing of the project has been a combination of debt and equity. A lot of the costs associated with achieving phase two have come from self-funding, from the profits from the business since it has been operating. The main shareholders are our directors, led by Nathaniel le Roux, who has around 42% of the equity.

Laura Husband: What can the global apparel industry do to help Sri Lanka secure GSP+?

Yohan Lawrence: GSP+ concessions are conditional on qualifying countries ratifying and effectively implementing 27 international conventions spanning human rights, labour rights, the environment, and good governance. Therefore, at this point, the onus is on Sri Lanka to ensure that the required criteria are met. 

We must understand that over 30% of Sri Lanka’s apparel exports are to the EU and having GSP+ in this current economic environment is critical. Apparel factories in the north and east regions, for example, export at least over 80% of their products under this scheme. Sri Lankan apparel was the very first large-scale manufacturing sector to enter the region and remains the single largest sector in those areas today. This has infused much-needed investment into the community and provides employment opportunities, especially for women in the north and east (the majority of whom are breadwinners), following the end of the civil war. 

Therefore, concessionary schemes like this help Sri Lanka to be price competitive within the EU market. 

Laura Husband: Is JAAF in talks with the European Commission?

Yohan Lawrence: As an industry body, we do not engage directly with the EU Commission regarding GSP+; as it is a matter dealt with from government to government. On the other hand, whenever a delegation visits our country, we make every effort to arrange a meeting with them in our capacity as the leading authority representing the apparel sector, as and when necessary. 

However, we work closely with relevant government authorities and the newly established International Trade Office to ensure the importance of GSP+ is recognised and that Sri Lanka makes its application within the required timeline, abiding by protocol. 

Laura Husband: When can we expect to receive the report by the European Commission that was due to be released in early 2023?  

Yohan Lawrence: While we do not know the details, our understanding is that this is imminent, and we are confident that the government is fully aware of the importance of the continuity of GSP+. A cabinet paper was recently submitted highlighting the importance of securing the trade scheme. 

In May, talks were held between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the EU Joint Commission, with the visiting delegation providing a brief on the new cycle of the EU GSP+ Regulations to be adopted for 2024 – 2033.  

Laura Husband: Should brands/apparel manufacturers be concerned about the Clean Clothes Campaign’s claims that garment workers are not receiving Emergency Relief Allowances (ERA), and could claims like this make securing GSP+ beyond 2023 more difficult?

Yohan Lawrence: As the apex body of the apparel industry, we have strongly refuted the implications in the brief. Not paying wages is against the law, and several audits have shown that our member companies have paid all wages during the pandemic. Furthermore, the instituting of the ‘Emergency Relief Allowance’ mentioned in the brief implies a form of legal agency. The government – nor any other statutory body – has mandated the ‘ERA’ or developed a formula to calculate what it should be nor provided any other number. It is unfortunate that organisations have presented this as being some form of a legal requirement. 

The industry has always acknowledged the importance of its teams being the backbone of the industry and understands the hardship permeating from the recent increase in the cost of living. Companies have made necessary salary adjustments and provided benefits – but claims like these do not prompt any action to overcoming the current challenges the industry faces. 

Laura Husband: Will this make it challenging to secure GSP+?

Yohan Lawrence: We do not see it that way because, as stated earlier, the onus is on Sri Lanka to ensure the required criteria is met. But availing of GSP+ will positively impact worker earnings, which is why it becomes critical to ensure that we obtain this benefit to safeguard workers’ livelihoods.

Laura Husband: Throughout Sri Lanka’s economic crisis, many global brands showed their support for Sri Lanka’s apparel sector – is this continuing, and is there any concern over the potential loss of GSP+? 

Yohan Lawrence: It is heartening to know the support we continued to receive from major brands throughout the economic crisis and the trust placed in Sri Lanka’s ability to deliver. This continues to this day. These brands have acknowledged that the talent and skills of our employees have played a significant role in displaying the country’s resiliency.  

This was only possible with the government’s support and other entities including the Export Development Board to ensure our plants could operate unhindered during the fuel and energy crisis.  

More than concerns about GSP+, global brands and local manufacturers are working together to power through the global economic slowdown and cushion the impact of the global economic downturn on the sector. We hope to see a turning point at the end of the year. 

Laura Husband: What could happen to Sri Lanka’s apparel sector after 2023 if GSP+ is not secured?

Yohan Lawrence: If GSP+ concessions are withdrawn, Sri Lanka will not only severely lose its competitive edge, risking the sustenance of the apparel industry, but it will also lose $494m worth of exports, at a time when the country’s priority should be in reaching as many diverse markets as possible. The Institute of Policy Studies also indicated that the apparel industry would be among the worst-hit sectors if Sri Lanka is to be withdrawn from the GSP+. 

Other sectors that would be affected include tobacco, seafood, and rubber. With Sri Lanka being identified as a country with the least use of its preferential market access among all GSP+ countries, the loss of preferential access will halt the industry’s drive to increase the current utilisation rate (63%) and efforts to expand Sri Lanka apparel’s market share in the EU.   

Laura Husband: What is JAAF’s plan for Sri Lanka’s apparel sector if GSP+ is not an option? Will you be looking to grow the country’s market share outside Europe?

Yohan Lawrence: The EU market is integral to Sri Lanka apparel. We have a number of European investments in the sector, some going back 40 years and protecting this market is one of our key objectives. That said, we acknowledge the need to have a wider base of exports and have been actively engaging with top government and foreign ministry officials for some time now, to expedite negotiations on Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) outside the EU and the UK.  

At a time when the country’s economy is in a critical state, securing new FTAs can help export diversification and reduce barriers for Sri Lankan apparel exporters. Furthermore, it will generate much-needed foreign exchange for the country. Therefore, securing an FTA with China is one of our key priorities.  

There is also great potential within the Indian market with the Indo-Sri Lanka FTA. Under the current arrangement, the country can only export eight million ready-made pieces annually, but Sri Lanka has the potential to export much more. Beyond this, we also see potential in countries like Canada, Japan, South Korea and Australia and continue to push for better market access to these countries. 

If the apparel sector is to successfully diversify its markets and, in the process, increase its resilience and secure the jobs of the untold hundreds of thousands, earning a living through this sector. The strategic vision of the Sri Lankan Government and the coordinated actions of its diplomatic missions will be most important.